RE: ABNF to Draft -- pending issues

Thanks for the update.  I need to work out a procedural issue with Harald
(he's still holding a discuss on 2234), but I can do that.  I'll keep you
posted.

-Scott-

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Crocker [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:11 PM
> To: Scott Hollenbeck
> Cc: Patrik Fdltstrvm; ietf-822; Paul Overell; Rob Cameron; 
> Chris Newman; Julian Reschke; Bill Fenner; Ned Freed / 822; 
> Harald Tveit Alvestrand; Dave Crocker; Sandro Mazzucato; Pete 
> Resnick; Brian Bidulock; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: ABNF to Draft -- pending issues
> Importance: High
> 
> 
>  On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:22:41 -0800, Dave Crocker wrote:
> >  Folks,
> >
> >  It's too late to submit the ABNF revision as an I-D, until after
> >  Minneapolis, but here is a pointer to the revision:
> >
> >  ; 
> <http://bbiw.net/specifications/draft-crocker-abnf-rfc2234bis-
02dc.html>
>
>  ; <http://bbiw.net/specifications/draft-crocker-abnf-rfc2234bis-02dc.txt>
>
>
>  As noted in the Acknowledgements section, Julian Reschke gets a very big
>  THANKS! for converting the source to xml.  I've tweaked it only a bit.
>
>  d/



Scott,

I believe ABNF is done, which is to say that it is ready for Draft.

1. The revised spec is at the above location, obviously needing formal i-d
submission after this week.

2. All of the outstanding items, concerning the document, pertain to
enhancements, rather than to 'fixing bugs in the spec'.  Although most or
all of the enhancements are reasonable, they would require re-cycling at
Proposed.  In response to my queries about whether to recycle vs. go to
draft, the overwhelming preference, is for moving to Draft.  Hence, no
enhancements to abnf have been done.

So I believe you may continue processing the specification for Draft status.

 d/
 --
 Dave Crocker
 Brandenburg InternetWorking
 +1.408.246.8253
 dcrocker  a t ...
 WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net