Re: Test with From <> (3)
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In <[email protected]> "Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> writes: >>Message-Id: <[email protected]> >>Date: Mon, 21 Mar 1005 12:49:06 +0000 >>Subject: Test with From <> (3) >>From: Charles Lindsey <> >>Reply-To: [email protected] >>To: [email protected] >OK, so I seemed to have managed to get this test case past the list >expander at imc.org, so we can wee what it does on a variety of routes >after that (but my example with no From field at all seems to have been >eaten at imc). >So, the first question is: >IS THERE ANYBODY WHO DID NOT RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE AT ALL? >(Have to hold my own hand up here, but I shall poke around to see it it >was lost on my system or whether Spamassassin ate it, or something). On poking around in my logs, it was due to the bad Date header. I gateway this list into a local news group, and CNews is very hot on discarding news articles with bad syntax. Pete Hoffman has now subscribed <> and <-@[]> to the list, so these should now be reaching you. The (4) series also had a typo in the Date header, so the (5) series is about to go out (one with no From and one with From <-@[]>). Please report if you fail to receives these, or if they arrive with "interesting" manglements. -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: [email protected] Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5