Re: Message with no From at all (6)
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In <[email protected]> "Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> writes: >So we have so far established that "From: <>" gets through to most people >(except Bruce, who claims he never received his) but we need more evidence >as to what systems allow completely absent Froms to pass through >unscathed. So, having failed to get my test messages (other than From: <>) through the mail expander at imc, I sent test messages with no From header at all directly to 12 people on this list who had replied to my earlier <> tests. I have 9 replies, of which 6 reported that their local Delivery agent, or an MTA close to that, had manufactured a From header out of the envelope from (which was readily identifiable, being [email protected]). Two of these were Sendmail, two were Postfix, and one was PMDF/JESMS (the other didn't say). It was reported that Exim, Gmail and Qmail were happy to pass the message without alteration. Although Sendmail can be configured not to make this change, it is the default and few sites change it (though one recipient had done so on his own system). There was quite some discussion amongst some of these 12 recipients afterwards in which some of them expressed the opinion that the current behaviour of Sendmail et al was actually a Good Thing, especially for large ISPs. It was also reported that some IMAPs might not take kindly to a missing From, although apparently Cyrus is OK. So it looks like maybe 50% of existing systems would do unsuitable things with Bruce's proposal, either by giving away the envelope From address (thus defeating the ourpose of the proposal) or, in the case of messages which had made it through a mailing list, putting the address of the mailing list expander in the From header, which could cause much confusion. OTOH, it appears that From: <> will propagate pretty well on the existing network. The only reported problem has been from Bruce, who claimed not to have seen the test message to this list (though most others seem to have seen it). I also sent a test with From: <> direct to Bruce's MX, but he has not yet reported whether or not it arrived. -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: [email protected] Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5