Re: I-D ACTION:draft-lilly-legacy-fields-00.txt

On Thu April 21 2005 22:49, Keith Moore wrote:

> would that be like fighting useless sarcasm with more useless sarcasm?

The question is really off-topic for the mailing list, but the answer
is "no".

Now, if you know of any unregistered but RFC-documented message header
fields which aren't included in RFC 4021 registration forms or the
draft, contrary to the requirement of section 3 of BCP 90, that might
be a useful topic for either this mailing list or the ones mentioned in
BCP 90.