Re: Understanding response protocols
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 11:23:01 GMT Lines: 26 MIME-Version: 1.0 In <[email protected]> Paul Jakma <[email protected]> writes: >On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Charles Lindsey wrote: >> Which existing MUAs have the feature to set the Reply-To field >> "_automatically_" according to the particular list(s) involved? >Pine does, via 'roles'. You would set up a role for each list setting >role selector as to be 'Participant' == 'list mailbox', and then in >the 'Actions' set 'Set-Reply-To' to list mailbox. Does it really allow you to set the Reply-To field according to the "role"? Certainly, the intention wrt Mail-Followup-To was that users could set something like those "roles", but in a manner that generated a MFT field depedong on the "role". -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: [email protected] Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5