Re: Off-topic: @
Alan Barrett <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, Bruce Lilly wrote: > Worse than that. The original (see RFC 561) was <SP> AT <SP> only, and > space was subsequently permitted within words (RFC 724 et seq until RFC > 2822 eliminated it) or even within atoms (RFC 733 et seq ...), I heve never before encountered the idea that space was ever permitted inside words or atoms. Could you cite the parts of the specs that you think permit this? (There might be bugs in the BNF, and it is possible that such bugs might be used to support an argument about spaces in words, but the text of the RFCs seems clear enough that spaces are permitted in "reasonable places" such as between words or atoms.) --apb (Alan Barrett)