Re: 2822bis and ""@example.org

On 2007-03-28, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> 
> In 2822 that address is apparently valid. Should that be so?
> 
> I could understand it being a valid obs-this-or-that address. But it 
> seems to be quite simply valid. Message parsers must parse it, messages 
> senders may generate it.

""@[]

is also valid, as discussed here some time ago (beginning September 30, 2002).
I seem to recall that you participated in that discussion...