Re: [2822upd] Resent-* MUSTard
Bruce Lilly <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Organization | Bruce Lilly |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2007-05-02, Pete Resnick wrote:
> It is perfectly
> reasonable to resend post-delivery. In that case, you'll have
> Resent-* fields prepended to the message which may already have a
> Return-Path. It will get a new Return-Path when it is delivered to
will -> may (Return-Path is optional per *822 (and
as previously noted, resending might not use SMTP))
> the mailbox in the Resent-To, and that will be the MAIL FROM of the
> resender.
>
> Maybe there's an argument for removing a Return-Path before
> prepending the Resent-* fields, but that's a different discussion.
Sounds reasonable. Maybe resending and the Resent- fields could be
moved to a separate document, which could more fully discuss the
issues relevant to resending (which transcends the message format per se).