Pete asked me to post my position on this, so...
I believe that the best course of action is to remove NO-WS-CTL from
the generate syntax, leaving it in the interpret syntax. This includes
its use in quoted-pair/qtext, ctext, and dtext.
I think this is the right way to go because otherwise it is going to be
tought o demonstrate interoperability moving to draft. It's especially
important to remove it from quoted-string since those can be parts of
addresses, but I fail to see a reason why we should retain this for
comments or domain literals.
Ned
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.