Re: Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity)

Pete Resnick <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.dkim,gmane.ietf.rfc822,gmane.ietf.smtp
Message-ID <p0625012dc37b9875bdb6@[192.17.144.29]>
[Apologies for duplicates, if any. List issues and decided to Cc 
ietf-822 and ietf-smtp.]

On 12/1/07 at 3:30 PM +0000, John Levine wrote:

>RFC 2822 section 3.6.2 describes originator fields.  By my reading 
>it is pretty clear that a list should add a Sender: field with the 
>list's name since it's the list that's sending the mail.

Uh.....not by my reading. Lists add List-* fields (RFC 2369, RFC 
2919) if they want to indicate something. Fields in the original 
message should be preserved as-is.

>Section 3.6.6 describes resent headers.  One could make a plausible 
>argument that a list should add a Resent-Sender: rather than a 
>Sender: but it's reasonable to do it either way.

Mailing lists using Resent-* fields gives me the willies. Resent-* 
fields were intended for MUAs resending mail. They weren't intended 
for mailing lists.

pr
--
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated
-- 
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.