Re: Handling of NO-WS-CTL in 2822bis
Philip Guenther <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Pete Resnick wrote: > Let me explain what is involved in doing this. If people are OK with this, > I'll go ahead. To remove NO-WS-CTL, we need to: > > - Remove NO-WS-CTL from ctext, qtext, utext, and dtext. (That makes utext > simply VCHAR.) > - Create obs-ctext, obs-qtext, and obs-dtext which contain NO-WS-CTL. > (Question: Should they contain NUL as well?) > - Add NO-WS-CTL to obs-utext. > - Change quoted-pair to use "WS / VCHAR" instead of "text". > - Change section 2.2 to say that header fields only contain VCHARs. > - Change much of the text in the beginning of section 4 to add talk of > NO-WS-CTL. The above looks correct and minimal to me. > Is everyone sure they want to do this? Do we think this will recycle at > Proposed? It is effectively removing what we think is an unused feature from > the document in anticipation of Draft, but it is a significant textual > change. Yes and yes. Philip Guenther