Re: Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity)
Hector Santos <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dkim,gmane.ietf.rfc822,gmane.ietf.smtp |
|---|---|
| Organization | Santronics Software, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dave Crocker wrote:
>
>
> Tony Finch wrote:
>>> "The "Sender:" field specifies the
>>> mailbox of the agent responsible for the actual transmission of the
>>> message."
>>
>> Popular MTA implementations (Sendmail, Postfix) do not implement the
>> Sender: header the way 822 and 2822 suggest,
>
> How would you describe what they do do?
Well, if SendMail/PostFix is operating like the rest of the world... If
missing, a SMTP receiver MIGHT do:
Sender: <-- x821.MailFrom
in the same vain many SMTP receivers will fill in the missing 822
required fields.
FROM: <<-- x821.MailFrom
To: <<-- x821.RcptTo
and they MUST do this if they want to SUPPORT the presentation layers.
But sender is not a given because it is not a 822 required field. In
fact, I seem to recall, it was only in recent years that we even
bothered with Sender in our mailers.
Only a few sites will reject such empty headers in the DATA block. Off
hand, I know of one, HOTMAIL.COM and they only started to reject mail
without the headers when SENDER-ID support was added to HOTMAIL.COM.
--
Sincerely
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com