Re: rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text

Pete,

you wrote on 01/19/2008 01:27:46:

> 
> On 1/19/08 at 1:25 AM +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
> 
> >  > ... to mean that the agent responsible for transmission of the
> >  > message has not been specified explicitly.
> >               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> >After all, it *is* true that this information has not been specified 
> >*explicitly*, it has been specified implicitly.
> 
> Ah, right. Strike the word "explicitly". Will do. Thanks.

I'm not sure that this works for me. Could I suggest:

... to mean that the agent responsible for transmission of the
message is specified implicitly rather than explicitly.

Nick