Re: 2822upd-06 submitted

On 2/11/08 at 4:49 PM +0000, Charles Lindsey wrote:

>So I think the only renmaining differences between msg-id here and 
>in USEFOR (assuming USEFOR can now get rid of its own attempts to 
>fix the problems) is that 2822bis still allows '>' in a 
>no-fold-literal and USEFOR does not. But we can probably live with 
>that.

I would be made very happy if you can live with that.

>A couple of niggles:
>
>In 2.2.3:
>
>"An unfolded header field has no length restriction and therefore 
>may be infinitely long."
>
>I doubt that is possible :-( . I suggest s/infinitely/indefinately/.

I'll fix that.

>And in Appendix B:
>
>"9.   Removed quoted-pair from domain literals.*"
>
>I think they are removed from no-fold-literals also.

Right.

>And where did that '*' come from?

"Items marked with an asterisk (*) below are items which appear in 
section 4 of this document and therefore can no longer be generated."

>The only remaining issue that I have is the SP after colon business. 
>You asked for some text, someone provided it, Frank approved and I 
>suggested some small improvements. Is there any reason not to 
>proceed with that?

I had a couple of offline comments on the form of the text and 
alternative formulations. I will encourage those folks to share their 
comments on the list.

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102