Re: 2822upd-06 submitted

Charles Lindsey writes:
> Maybe, but that could be a long time a-coming.
>
> Surely it is better to include a non-normative NOTE to cover issues 
> like this, where one wishes to discourage 'stupid' behaviour 
> (especially where it might cause interoperability with other 
> protocols), but where there are good reasons (as here) not to go so 
> far as a SHOULD NOT.

Put differently: "Since noone could be foolish enough to volunteer as 
editor for such a document, Pete should do it as non-normative notes in 
2822upd". My name isn't Pete so I rather like the idea, but I don't 
dare suggest it to him ;)

Arnt