| Newsgroups |
gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
kalyani.oryx.com with esmtp id 1216818534-15340-24 for
[email protected]; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:08:54 +0200
Message-Id: <3YoOne/OCLp3IUWqip/[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:07:03 +0200
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from
draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Paul Smith writes:
> So, what would you want the recipient MUA to do with these. The
> consensus seems to be that they should still receive them - so what
> difference does the 'expires' make?
That isn't quite correct, but RFC 2852 handles the cases where it isn't true.
2852 is fine and does a useful job for the (few) people who use it. I
don't see what this Expir{es,y-Date} header field really offers.
Arnt