Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15

Keith Moore <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rfc822
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Tony Finch wrote:

> Of course MUAs should just use the protocol's negotiation features to
> auto-configure the most secure settings possible.

strongly disagree.  the problem is that when you try to negotiate the 
most secure settings possible, you often create a way for the 
negotiation to be dumbed down by an attacker to the least secure setting 
possible.

e.g. for an MUA that tries first to use an "SSL port" and if that fails, 
tries to use the normal port without SSL (and sending the password in 
cleartext) all the attacker has to do is arrange for the client to see 
an ICMP port unreachable packet or TCP RST at the right time, after 
which the client will happily send the user's password in cleartext.

Keith
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.