Re: Intent to revive "expires" header fromdraft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In <[email protected]> Russ Allbery <[email protected]> writes: >"Frank Ellermann" <[email protected]> writes: >> Reviving "Expires" is already a long shot, renaming it is a >> waste of everybody's time. I just checked usefor-usepro-09, >> it doesn't even mention "Expires". >Of course not; usepro doesn't define header fields. Header fields are >defined in usefor. From draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-11.txt: Indeed, because Usepro does not specify any protocol action that has to be taken when this header is encountered (and if it did, it would only be a "MAY"). The Usefor draft tells you everything you need to know about it. -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: [email protected] Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5