Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
Michael Welzl <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Organization | University of Innsbruck |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 21:49 -0400, Hector Santos wrote: > Michael Welzl wrote: > > >> The Expires header indicates a date-time, at which this > >> message expires. The field can be used both to limit and to > >> extend the life of a message. User agents and servers which > >> employ automatic purging of old messages MAY let this field > >> influence the purging process. There is no requirement that a > >> user agent must suppress expired messages or make them > >> inaccessible to their owners. > > > > Let's analyze the paragraph: > > > > * sentence 1 is fine with me. > > > > * sentence 2, "can be used both to limit and to extend" seems > > confusing and strange to me. > > Not sure why that is odd to you. > > If you have accepted the reality that backends already expire messages > regardless of flags or user permission, the question is how would this I changed my mind yesterday about sentence 1: it waters the other statement that I want to have in there, about only doing this when it's explicitly allowed by the user. So, regarding "acceptance of this reality", sure I accept that such things happen, but this is not what we design for. Cheers, Michael