Re: Intent to revive "expires" header fromdraft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
Russ Allbery <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Organization | The Eyrie |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Keith Moore <[email protected]> writes: > yes, it's advisory in theory. but in practice Expires in netnews means > "delete the message on or before this date" for very close to 100% of > the servers out there - precisely because in netnews the assumption is > that all messages will expire after a relatively short time anyway. The part after the dash doesn't imply the part before the dash, and I think you're underestimating the number of servers that ignore Expires or set minimum expiration times that disable its effect. > the definitions as stated are very similar, but the definitions have to > be evaluated within their usage contexts - and the two contexts are very > different. basically the two contexts are so different that to use > Expires in email would likely result in confusing, surprising, and > undesirable behavior in email. Okay. It appears we simply have different opinions after looking at the same data. I will just register my complete disagreement with the above paragraph for the record of the discussion. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>