Re: Fw: requested tweak to 2822upd grammar - consensus call

Pete Resnick <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rfc822
Message-ID <p06250100c5042f492167@[75.145.176.242]>
On 9/26/08 at 9:55 AM -0400, Tony Hansen wrote:

>From what I understand, the definitions of id-left and id-right that 
>msg-id-core refers to are slightly different between usefor and 5322 
>(nee 2822upd).

That's true, but I don't see what difference that makes. The usefor 
document can redefine whatever it likes (including id-left and 
id-right). There's no harm if 5322 defines:

msg-id-core = id-left "@" id-right

Please someone, explain the objection to using msg-id-core. 
Otherwise, I see no reason not to use it.

>The argument espoused is that adding msg-id-kernel allows that 
>internal portion of the msg-id to be used by people in other 
>documents; as 5322 stands, that's not possible.

Do we have an example of someone wanting to use this?

Also, does adding it also mean that we should remove the last 
sentence of 3.6.4? "Semantically, the angle bracket characters are 
not part of the msg-id; the msg-id is what is contained between the 
two angle bracket characters."

This change is making me increasingly worried. Are we sure we want to do this?

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.