Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft

Dave CROCKER <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.apps-discuss,gmane.ietf.rfc822
Organization Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On 4/15/2011 9:44 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> The intended status of this document doesn't give any kind of standard status to malformations.  It recommends the safest way of handling them if you're in an environment where you have to do so rather than simply rejecting them.  And the reality is that we (the industry) usually have to do that, so it seems like a good idea to share the collected wisdom about the best/safest way to do so.


Perhaps we need to add a new document classification, given this long-term need 
to acknowledge and deal with real-world operational pragmatics and the benefit 
of regularizing them:  Best Current Bad Practices

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.