Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft

On Fri Apr 15 17:47:50 2011, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/15/2011 9:44 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> The intended status of this document doesn't give any kind of  
>> standard status to malformations.  It recommends the safest way of  
>> handling them if you're in an environment where you have to do so  
>> rather than simply rejecting them.  And the reality is that we  
>> (the industry) usually have to do that, so it seems like a good  
>> idea to share the collected wisdom about the best/safest way to do  
>> so.
> 
> 
> Perhaps we need to add a new document classification, given this  
> long-term need to acknowledge and deal with real-world operational  
> pragmatics and the benefit of regularizing them:  Best Current Bad  
> Practices

I've heard the suggestion of LWP - Least Worst Practise - before.

Dave.
-- 
Dave Cridland - mailto:[email protected] - xmpp:[email protected]
  - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
  - http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade