Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft

Keith Moore <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.apps-discuss,gmane.ietf.rfc822
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I do think there's room for some sort of "if you must do this bad thing, please do it this way" document series from IETF.

However, I don't think that would be applicable to having third party mail relays repair malformed messages.  I think that's no longer "best way to do something that has the potential to do harm" and closer to "how to make a bad situation worse".  

Of course, the devil is in the details.

Keith

On Apr 15, 2011, at 12:56 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On 4/15/2011 9:54 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>> I've heard the suggestion of LWP - Least Worst Practise - before.
> 
> 
> I like that /much/ better than what I suggested.  Concise, accurate and appropriately apologetic.
> 
> d/
> 
> -- 
> 
>  Dave Crocker
>  Brandenburg InternetWorking
>  bbiw.net
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.