Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Keith Moore <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.apps-discuss,gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I do think there's room for some sort of "if you must do this bad thing, please do it this way" document series from IETF. However, I don't think that would be applicable to having third party mail relays repair malformed messages. I think that's no longer "best way to do something that has the potential to do harm" and closer to "how to make a bad situation worse". Of course, the devil is in the details. Keith On Apr 15, 2011, at 12:56 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > > > > On 4/15/2011 9:54 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: >> I've heard the suggestion of LWP - Least Worst Practise - before. > > > I like that /much/ better than what I suggested. Concise, accurate and appropriately apologetic. > > d/ > > -- > > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net >