Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.apps-discuss,gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F1343319E8B@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Arnt Gulbrandsen [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 2:26 PM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft > > I found the advice rather naïve. Not bad, but also not very > sophisticated, and I fear that extending it to be comprehensive will not > produce a readable document. It's meant only as a starting point. And I think extending it, if done carefully, will produce something readable and valuable. > Still, I can see value in a document whose abstract says "here are some > of the bad things you must expect to receive, and not just from > spammers". Is that the goal of your draft? "...and what the consensus view is about what to do with them," precisely.