Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Dave CROCKER <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Organization | Brandenburg InternetWorking |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/15/2011 7:09 PM, [email protected] wrote: > More like "almost always". I estimate we average one complaint that turns out > to be message maformation every week or two, and it's been this way for almost > two decades. But despite the fact we as a matter of policy *always* push back > saying "fix the actual problem", I can't recall more than a handful of cases > where this resulted in the actual problem being tracked down and fixed. > Workarounds are a lot easier than, say, getting a printer manufacturer > to update their firmware so it doesn't produce this content-type header: Receive-side workarounds, rather than rejections of protocol/format violations, seems to be an inherent state of affairs for apps protocols. No one likes that fact, but no one has come up with a way to change the reality. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net