Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft

Dave CROCKER <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rfc822
Organization Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID <[email protected]>


On 4/15/2011 7:09 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> More like "almost always". I estimate we average one complaint that turns out
> to be message maformation every week or two, and it's been this way for almost
> two decades. But despite the fact we as a matter of policy *always* push back
> saying "fix the actual problem", I can't recall more than a handful of cases
> where this resulted in the actual problem being tracked down and fixed.
> Workarounds are a lot easier than, say, getting a printer manufacturer
> to update their firmware so it doesn't produce this content-type header:


Receive-side workarounds, rather than rejections of protocol/format violations, 
seems to be an inherent state of affairs for apps protocols.  No one likes that 
fact, but no one has come up with a way to change the reality.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.