RE: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:29:10 -0700

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.rfc822
Message-ID	<F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F1343319F42@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Keith Moore
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 9:25 PM
> To: Charles Lindsey
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
> 
> That's not to say that I want MSAs to forward thoroughly broken
> messages; I don't.  But once a message leaves the MSA, I think the
> opportunity to provide any kind of useful feedback to the submitter has
> probably passed.

Where the MSA is under the control of someone that wants to exploit browser or MUA weaknesses, or doesn't care about standards as long as his/her crap gets to the inbox, doesn't that view of the world means there's no hope for improvement?