Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header
Ned Freed <[email protected]> Sun, 09 Sep 2012 23:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I have just posted draft-leiba-5322upd-from-group-04:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-leiba-5322upd-from-group/
> That changes the definition of Sender as well as From, and also adds a
> new "Applicability Statement" section that has an edited version of
> some text suggested by John Klensin (thanks, John). I like the
> result, and I hope others do as well: it makes it clearer that we're
> not recommending the general use of group syntax in From and Sender,
> but are enabling it for limited use in certain situations (of which
> the EAI use case is so far the only one).
> Further comments before I ask Pete to run a formal last call on this?
It occurs to me that now that sender has changed from
sender = mailbox
to
sender = address
Since address can be a group, and a group can contain multiple addresses, we've
left a crack through which the syntax allows multiple address to slip into a
sender field.
I suppose we could define sender as something like this:
sender = mailbox / (display-name ":" (mailbox / CFWS) ";" [CFWS])
But this seems kinda ugly to me. I think a note to the effect that at most one
address can appear in a sender group construct would suffice.
Aside from that, this document looks spot on to me.
Ned
_______________________________________________
ietf-822 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822