Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header
Ned Freed <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I should also add that I believe this change addresses the remaining issue. Ned > > >> OLD > > >> If the from field contains more than one address (mailbox or group) in the > > >> address-list, then the sender field, containing the field name "Sender" and a > > >> single mailbox or group specification, MUST appear in the message. > > > > > >> NEW > > >> If the from field contains more than one address (mailbox or group) in the > > >> address-list, then the sender field, containing the field name "Sender" and a > > >> single mailbox or group specification that refers to no more than > > >> one mailbox, MUST appear in the message. > > > > > > <pedant> > > > > > > This only covers the case where the from: contains more than one address. What > > > about the case where the from is a single address but different from the > > > sender? > > > > > > </pedant> > > He-he-he. > > Yes, so I'll also add that to the end of the paragraph after the grammar: > > OLD > > Otherwise, both fields SHOULD appear. > > NEW > > Otherwise, both fields SHOULD appear. If the "Sender:" field > > specifies a group, that group SHOULD NOT refer to more than > > one mailbox. > > (Q: "SHOULD NOT", or "MUST NOT"?) > I think MUST NOT is appropriate here. > Ned > _______________________________________________ > ietf-822 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822 _______________________________________________ ietf-822 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822