Re: The MIME-Version header and comments
Ned Freed <[email protected]> Fri, 23 Nov 2012 17:00:18 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> RFC 2045's ABNF grammar for the MIME-Version header does not contain > any reference to CFWS or other tokens which can expand to allow comments: > version := "MIME-Version" ":" 1*DIGIT "." 1*DIGIT That's because RFC 2045 is based on the style of ABNF in RFC 822 where CFWS is allowed between any token, versus RFC 2822 ABNF where it isn't. > Despite that, the RFC is pretty clear that any RFC822 comments are to be > ignored [1]. Is that an error in the ABNF grammar, or is there a generic rule > for comments somewhere else? Yes. In RFC 822. Ned _______________________________________________ ietf-822 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822