Re: A permission to re-sign header
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> 18 Apr 2014 15:05:54 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> First of all, "permission to re-sign" seems to me to be the wrong semantics. > This is simply "originally sent from here to there". The originating site > (example.com) wants to say, "This message came from example.com and got sent > to [email protected]", in a way that someone who receives a message > from foo.example.net can check. It has to be more than that, it has to say that it's OK for foo.example.net to pass it along in modified form. I suppose it doesn't have to be re-signed, foo.example.net could do SPF path authentication, but that mixes message and path authentication in a way that makes me nervous. Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. _______________________________________________ ietf-822 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 2.2 KB) - not displayed