Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Paul Smith <[email protected]> Sat, 19 Apr 2014 11:12:35 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 18/04/2014 21:38, [email protected] wrote: > 3. It's going to take months or years to come up with a new > specification and to get it deployed, and in the mean time, there will > be people who don't have the luxury of waiting for Godot. > > Basically, there will be people who need a short-term fix, and are we > really satisified with the Mailman: > > From: Pete Resnick <[email protected]> > > workaround? > > I know I'm not.... > > - Ted OK - devil's advocate here... Why not? It doesn't really bother me. In many cases, I'd actually like it, as it wouldn't be publishing my email address to all and sundry. If it's a big problem in some cases, could the original sender by put in another header, or could RESENT- fields be used, or could the From address be munged (From: Pete Resnick <[email protected]> )? - Paul Smith Computer Services Tel: 01484 855800 Vat No: GB 685 6987 53 _______________________________________________ ietf-822 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822