Re: Mailing lists - assumptions

Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Sat, 19 Apr 2014 08:57:48 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.rfc822
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Pete Resnick <[email protected]> wrote:
    > On 4/18/14 2:20 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
    >> We need to answer the question, explicitly, about whether or not the
    >> sites which are currently honoring the DMARC p=reject policy can be
    >> assumed to adopt whatever we come up with.

    > There may be sending sites that do *not* want their mail redistributed
    > through mailing lists, or at least don't want their mail redistributed
    > through mailing lists that don't support whatever the nifty new mechanism
    > is. They'll want to say, "If you didn't get it directly from me, it
    > went

Maybe p=reject can replace the stupid "confidential" notices.
Clearly any email on a mailing list with that notice on it, really wanted
p=reject!

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

_______________________________________________
ietf-822 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 307 B)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBU1JyzIqHRg3pndX9AQJZLQP+N2mfWYCyvK/KmdiJWzMyBeL8+OfXCf84
ti+0f4Kj2jPTI0wFOlnYPXXQ8osQBpG4IOMBrD3ICNRqiiOs28bs2p43pf0xcUCB
o4hHwbh4dpnv1+l+9zwIwTlr7umyKpmnmE/RsC/2sbK1tg15bXBuxRyEBvGpFZV8
N3wzbUhuhd4=
=n9r+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----