Re: DMARC Extension for 3rd party Signers

On Sunday, April 20, 2014 00:59:09 Hector Santos wrote:
> On 4/20/2014 12:17 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >> Where is the alignment requirement description for when only p=reject
> >> is used?
> > 
> > See section 3.1.4 of the current DMARC draft.
> 
> Got it. I see the problem.  DMARC by definition requires alignment for
> matching domains. An adkim=s (strict) is an exact match and adkim=r
> (relaxed) means sub-domains are allowed.
> 
>  From what I see, there is no 3rd party allowance and the only things
> that saves you is p=none or p=quarantine.

Yes.  As currently defined, p=reject is only suitable for some classes of 
domains and the current mess is because yahoo.com isn't in one of those 
classes.

Scott K

_______________________________________________
ietf-822 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822