Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> Sun, 20 Apr 2014 07:28:42 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:39:42AM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > > The problem is that there might be some receiving servers that will > > try to see if the originatingdomain.example.com.INVALID is a valid > > domain address, and seeing that it isn't, might reject the e-mail on > > that basis. > > Exactly. Why is that a problem? Upon rejection the user will notice > the ".INVALID" and remove it, just like he or she would have done if the > rejection had arrived from dmarc-remediation. The latter could have > contained a pointer to an explanation page, which interested users may > also find with google. User "[email protected]" sends mail to a mailing list which rewrites his from field to be "[email protected]". When his post gets sent to "[email protected]", hotmail.com could decide to bounce the message because the from field is invalid. And then just as in the case of DMARC-induced lossage, this counts towards [email protected]'s bounce count, and [email protected] could end up getting her membership to the mailing list suspended. If you change the from field to "[email protected]", that's a valid from field address, and reduces the chances that the receiving host will bounce the message. Part of the problem here is that mail can get bounced for many reasons --- the user's inbox could be full, the recipient could be honoring a DEMARC p=reject policy, it could just be the wrong time of month for the mailer. We could try to add some additional error codes that indicate that the problem is not the recipient's inbox, but rather that the incoming sender's from field, or SPF, or DKIM, or some other arbitrary problem which is not specific to the recipient which is causing the problem. If we had that, then the mailing list could much more easily decide that the right thing to do is to send the bounce mail back to [email protected], instead of having potentially autosuspending [email protected]'s mailing list service. Of course, then if [email protected] is subscribed to a mailign list with hundreds of addresses that are all playing the DEMARK p=reject game, it might not be pretty for [email protected]'s inbox.... - Ted _______________________________________________ ietf-822 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822