Re: don't need a permission to re-sign header
Ned Freed <[email protected]> Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> >> I've said for years that lists should sign > >> their mail with their own DKIM keys, and recipients should look at > >> those list signatures to filter the mail. > > > > I'm not even sure that's necessary, but of course it can't hurt. Indeed, right > > now, with the exception of IETF lists, having a signature makes the odds it's > > spam more, not less, likely. > I think that depends on your mail stream. Google signs all their mail > including gmail and hosted domains, and that's a big chunk of the mail I > get. Yahoo signs all theirs, too. The overwhelming majority of list spam I get is from Google. All with nice quthentic DKIM signatures. Ned _______________________________________________ ietf-822 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822