Re: Mailing lists - assumptions

Somebody have a wiki where we can set up a list of requirements and use 
cases to drive things forward?

Miles Fidelman

Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
> On 04/19/2014 04:40 AM, Ned Freed wrote:
>>> On 4/18/2014 12:20 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>>> > We need to answer the question, explicitly, about whether or not the
>>> > sites which are currently honoring the DMARC p=reject policy can be
>>> > assumed to adopt whatever we come up with.  Because if the answer is
>>> > no, then your assumption/requirement #2 is flat-out impossible:
>>
>>
>>> Clearly the broadening of DMARC's application is motivating the current
>>> discussion.
>>
>>> However I believe the technical issues that Pete and others are 
>>> pursuing
>>> does not depend upon DMARC and can have benefits beyond it.
>>
>>> As such, I suggest the focus be on basic issues and benefits, rather
>>> than putting DMARC into the critical path.
>>
>> Quite right. There may be value in having a way of attaching these 
>> sorts of, I
>> guess I'll call them recipient semantics, to originator signatures 
>> independent
>> of their ability to address the current DMARC mess.
>
> I'd suggest to extend this list of assumptions/work-to-do to other 
> scenario's like Johns 'WSJ mail an article' example and other use 
> cases which are common on the Internet.
>
> /rolf
>
> _______________________________________________
> ietf-822 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822


-- 
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra

_______________________________________________
ietf-822 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822