Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Ned Freed <[email protected]> Sun, 04 May 2014 08:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> In article <[email protected]> you write: > >I may be stupid here, but why does dmarc even apply to messages with a > >List-Id? Right now I can't think of any case where it makes sense to use > >both List-Id and DMARC. > What do you think would happen if a List-ID: tag was a free pass > through spam filters? When did DMARC become the only anti-spam mechanism in the world? Nowhere did Arnt say that messages containing a list-id should be exempted from all forms of AS/AV processing, only that DMARC in particular isn't useful in this case. FWIW, I agree with Arnt on this one. In fact the case has yet to be made that DKIM-based whitelisting of list mail is more than a nice-to-have; per-user whitelisting on the basis of List-id alone along with the usual checks for blatent viruses and whatnot seems to work pretty well. Ned _______________________________________________ ietf-822 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822