Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to... (off-topic)

On Monday, May 05, 2014 21:19:11 Miles Fidelman wrote:
> I haven't actually dug into the details of how Outlook does things,
> but... does not RFC5322's series of resent- headers start to provide a
> direction for standardizing mailing list use of header fields?

Before you go too far down this rat hole, consider how Sender ID worked out.  
It's premise was oriented around the idea that there was value in validating 
if those headers were authorized or not.  Also, it's almost impossible to pick 
the right header field out of From, Sender, Resent-From, and Resent-Sender 
without having to consider Microsoft patents (good, bad, or indifferent it's 
there - consult the MARID working group ML archives for details).

Scott K

_______________________________________________
ietf-822 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822