Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to... (off-topic)

Hi Miles,
At 18:19 05-05-2014, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>I haven't actually dug into the details of how Outlook does things, 
>but... does not RFC5322's series of resent- headers start to provide 
>a direction for standardizing mailing list use of header fields?

I read the relevant text as meaning that the "resent-" headers are 
added when a message is reintroduced.  I prefer to leave it to other 
people to interpret what that means.  There are a few List- headers 
which have been standardized for mailing lists.

I trimmed the headers of the message which I received from this mailing list:

   From: Miles Fidelman <[email protected]>
   MIME-Version: 1.0
   To: [email protected]
   Subject: Re: [ietf-822] WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to... (off-topic)
   Precedence: list
   List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format \[RFC 822,
     RFC 2822, RFC 5322\]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
   List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-822>,
     <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
   List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-822/>
   List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
   List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
   List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822>,
     <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
   Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
   Errors-To: [email protected]
   Sender: "ietf-822" <[email protected]>

There aren't any Resent- headers in the above.  I looked at a message 
that passed through another mailing list implementation; there 
weren't any Resent- headers.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy 

_______________________________________________
ietf-822 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822