Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> 5 May 2014 16:45:58 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> If we're discarding may-forward, then it seems to me we might be better off > talking about a whitelist publish/query mechanism that deserves > standardization here. Does VBR or a slight modification to it suffice, or > do we want something else? Anything that whitelists by domain name is going to end up similar to VBR, so if that's what we want to do, we might as well use VBR. I am assuming that this would not be a straight to the inbox whitelist, just one to skip DMARC policy processing. VBR can use a DKIM signature or validated SPF bounce address as a lookup handle (or Domain Keys or Sender ID, but I hope we agree they're dead.) Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. _______________________________________________ ietf-822 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822