RE: Begin WG Last Call: draft-ietf-rmonmib-raqmon-pdu-09

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> Actually for people who do not follow Mreview, this discussion
> in the last two days may be a little obscure. The discussions
> were around a MIB Review criteria nit which seems to contradict
> the way the RDS MIB module uses MAX-ACCESS in its reporting
> objects table. Even that discussion seems to settle now into
> relaxing this rule.

A side note (just for the sake of accuracy):  the particular nit in
RFC 2578 that we propose to relax with an erratum does not even
apply to the RAQMON-RDS-MIB.  draft-ietf-rmonmib-raqmon-pdu-09.txt
complies with the letter of RFC 2578 without the proposed erratum.

We now return you to the technical debate ...

//cmh