RE: index object restrictions for ipv4/v6 in raqmon-pdu

"Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rmonmib
Message-ID <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F07F67A68@IS0004AVEXU1.global.avaya.com>
So, if I am to take the model that you are providing, we should include in the DESCRIPTION clause of the compliance the following:

                There are one INDEX objects that cannot be 
                represented in the form of OBJECT clause in SMIv2, 
                but for which there are compliance requirements, 
                expressed in OBJECT clause form in this description: 
     
                           
                -- OBJECT      raqmonParticipantAddr 
                -- SYNTAX      InetAddress (SIZE (4 | 8 | 16 | 20)) 
                -- DESCRIPTION 
                --     This MIB requires support for global and 
                --     non-global IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. 

Good time for anyone who has an objection to express it.

Thanks and Regards,


Dan



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 10 March, 2005 9:38 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: RMON WG (E-mail)
> Subject: index object restrictions for ipv4/v6 in raqmon-pdu
> 
> 
> draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-07.txt is a doc that shows
> how we did it for InetAddressType and InetAddress in that
> document. I think it would make sense to do a simialr thing.
> 
> As discussed at IETF62
> 
> Bert
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.