RE: index object restrictions for ipv4/v6 in raqmon-pdu
"Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rmonmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F06E30CFE@IS0004AVEXU1.global.avaya.com> |
So, if I am to take the model that you are providing, we should include in the DESCRIPTION clause of the compliance the following:
There is one INDEX object that cannot be
represented in the form of OBJECT clause in SMIv2,
but for which there are compliance requirements,
expressed in OBJECT clause form in this description:
-- OBJECT raqmonParticipantAddr
-- SYNTAX InetAddress (SIZE (4 | 8 | 16 | 20))
-- DESCRIPTION
-- This MIB requires support for global and
-- non-global IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.
Good time for anyone who has an objection to express it.
Thanks and Regards,
Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 10 March, 2005 9:38 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: RMON WG (E-mail)
> Subject: index object restrictions for ipv4/v6 in raqmon-pdu
>
>
> draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-07.txt is a doc that shows
> how we did it for InetAddressType and InetAddress in that
> document. I think it would make sense to do a simialr thing.
>
> As discussed at IETF62
>
> Bert
>