RE: index object restrictions for ipv4/v6 in raqmon-pdu
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rmonmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15503C7A1B6@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com> |
Possibly also for index objects (in pdu document): raqmonPeerAddrType raqmonPeerAddr you ought to do something like below indeed. For the raqmonParticipantAddr occurence in the raqmonParticipantAddrTable you are re-using an object defined in another table, so I would not think that defining restriction here in this table makes sense, does it? You define the restrictions in the original object (which is defined read-only if I see it correctly). So see next para. For raqmonParticipantAddrType and raqmonParticipantAddr and for raqmonParticipantPeerAddrType and raqmonParticipantPeerAddr (in raqmon-mib document), you can do normal OBJECT clauses, they are read-only objects, no? Or am I mistaken here? Bert > -----Original Message----- > From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 00:58 > To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) > Cc: RMON WG (E-mail) > Subject: RE: index object restrictions for ipv4/v6 in raqmon-pdu > > > So, if I am to take the model that you are providing, we > should include in the DESCRIPTION clause of the compliance > the following: > > There is one INDEX object that cannot be > represented in the form of OBJECT clause in SMIv2, > but for which there are compliance requirements, > expressed in OBJECT clause form in this description: > > > -- OBJECT raqmonParticipantAddr > -- SYNTAX InetAddress (SIZE (4 | 8 | 16 | 20)) > -- DESCRIPTION > -- This MIB requires support for global and > -- non-global IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. > > Good time for anyone who has an objection to express it. > > Thanks and Regards, > > > Dan > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: 10 March, 2005 9:38 PM > > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) > > Cc: RMON WG (E-mail) > > Subject: index object restrictions for ipv4/v6 in raqmon-pdu > > > > > > draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-07.txt is a doc that shows > > how we did it for InetAddressType and InetAddress in that > > document. I think it would make sense to do a simialr thing. > > > > As discussed at IETF62 > > > > Bert > > >