RE: AD review of draft-ietf-rmonmib-raqmon-pdu-11.txt

> 
> Thanks, Bert. I will wait for your other comments and do another round
> to fix the nits. It would be great if other folks can have a 
> fresh look meantime.
> 
Yep.

> I have one question about the comments on references in the last part of
> your mail. What was the tool you used? They seem to be machine
> generated, and mostly derived from formatting. I will try to fix the
> formatting but I am not sure I grasp the intent for many of them, and
> then some other seem false alarms. 
> 

The tool I used is a private copy I got from RFC-Editor.
They do not want to distribute (I promised to not do so) since it has bugs,
and gives false alarms etc.  I do use it to help me do some checking,
but sometimes the list of false alarms is too big and I give up.
I did get it to the IETF Tools team, so hopefully they will add something
to the idnits checker at some point (its been a while though, maybe I need
to check with Henrik).

So I checked a few of the references/citations, and theyw ere indeed wrong.
I did not check all of it, but added the long list, so you could try to check.

No need to fix the cases where a citation is not found becuase you have a 
"hyphenation" break at the end of a line (I beleiebe [RAQMON-FRAMEWORK] had 
a number of those.

Bert
p.s. I hope to do one more RAQMON doc to day. and the 3rd one before end of week.

> Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:[email protected]] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 11:57 PM
> > To: Siddiqui, Anwar A (Anwar); Romascanu, Dan (Dan); 
> > 'Golovinsky, Eugene'; [email protected]; 
> > [email protected]
> > Cc: RMON WG (E-mail)
> > Subject: AD review of draft-ietf-rmonmib-raqmon-pdu-11.txt
> > 
> > Thanks for the new revision.
>