RE: security considerations in raqmon-pdu

 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam Hartman [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 6:53 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: [email protected]; Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Mani, Mahalingam (Mani)
> Subject: Re: security considerations in raqmon-pdu
> 
> >>>>> "Romascanu," == Romascanu, Dan (Dan) 
> <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>     Romascanu,> The proposed solution is to run a SASL plain
>     Romascanu,> authentication session in the layer beyond the raqmon
>     Romascanu,> PDU, so that explicit acks and nacks are being
>     Romascanu,> returned by the RRC without the need to create new PDU
>     Romascanu,> types or modify the unidirectional architecture of the
>     Romascanu,> raqmon PDUs. Examples for such a solution can be found
>     Romascanu,> in section 4 of RFC 3080 and section 6 of RFC 3920.
> 
> 
> I walked away from the conversation believing that e were 
> going to run SASL in the layer under the PDUs and presumably 
> to require plain as the mandatory to implement mechanism.
> 
> --Sam
> 
> 

That's what I meant to say, but I probably did not craft my words too
well. 

Dan