Re: security considerations in raqmon-pdu
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:53:03 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rmonmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Romascanu," == Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <[email protected]> writes: Romascanu,> The proposed solution is to run a SASL plain Romascanu,> authentication session in the layer beyond the raqmon Romascanu,> PDU, so that explicit acks and nacks are being Romascanu,> returned by the RRC without the need to create new PDU Romascanu,> types or modify the unidirectional architecture of the Romascanu,> raqmon PDUs. Examples for such a solution can be found Romascanu,> in section 4 of RFC 3080 and section 6 of RFC 3920. I walked away from the conversation believing that e were going to run SASL in the layer under the PDUs and presumably to require plain as the mandatory to implement mechanism. --Sam