Re: security considerations in raqmon-pdu

Sam Hartman <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:53:03 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rmonmib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>>>>> "Romascanu," == Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <[email protected]> writes:

    Romascanu,> The proposed solution is to run a SASL plain
    Romascanu,> authentication session in the layer beyond the raqmon
    Romascanu,> PDU, so that explicit acks and nacks are being
    Romascanu,> returned by the RRC without the need to create new PDU
    Romascanu,> types or modify the unidirectional architecture of the
    Romascanu,> raqmon PDUs. Examples for such a solution can be found
    Romascanu,> in section 4 of RFC 3080 and section 6 of RFC 3920.


I walked away from the conversation believing that e were going to run
SASL in the layer under the PDUs and presumably to require plain as
the mandatory to implement mechanism.

--Sam