Re: AD evaluation comments on draft-ietf-rmt-flute-revised-06

We droppen the URN thing in LCT, so it woul be consistent to do the  
same here.

...Mark

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 3, 2009, at 7:23 AM, "Magnus Westerlund" <[email protected] 
 > wrote:

> WG,
>
> I do have a proposal for these issues. But I do want to hear feedback
> about it. Lets drop the URN like naming scheme and simply use Verbal
> names for the different registry. Is anyone really using this in an  
> URN
> like fashion?
>
> For Flute it seems unlikely as the registry needed simply is a table
> between integers and their corresponding content encoding algorithm  
> with
> reference.
>
> What does the WG say about this?
>
> Magnus
>
>>>> 13. Section 8.3.1: It seems to be some confusion about the
>>>> usage of URN for purpose of describing where the name spaces
>>>> are. I think this needs to be clarified. Can the authors and
>>>> the chairs please try to resolve this with the IANA?
>>>>
>>> [Toni] I will contact IANA.
>>
>> Good, please add the chairs and me into the loop.
>>
>
> -- 
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
> IETF Transport Area Director
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: [email protected]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Rmt mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmt
_______________________________________________
Rmt mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmt