Re: ROHC v1 problems
"Karthik Balaguru" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rohc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I find that ROHC V2 (RFC 5225) defines a second version of the profiles found in RFC 3095. But, does it take RFC 4815 into consideration ? Are there any known issues in RFC 5225 ? Thx in advans, Karthik Balaguru On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Ghyslain Pelletier < [email protected]> wrote: > There are currently no known open issues on any of the ROHC profiles > based on RFC3095. > > All known issues have been corrected by RFC4815: > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4815.txt > > ///Ghyslain > > > ________________________________ > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Karthik Balaguru > Sent: den 20 september 2008 13:26 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [rohc] ROHC v1 problems > > > Hi, > > What are the major and minor problems with ROHC v1 ? > Can anyone give me a link that explains the problems with ROHC > v1 ? > > Thx in advans, > Karthik Balaguru > > _______________________________________________ Rohc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc